High Technology and Human Development

Some elementary premises – typically designed by leaders and supported by the light-emitting diode – exercise the led’s collective conscience to this point as they stimulate a willed development. The event is typically superior; however, not practically civilized. The premises in question area unit of this form: “Our level of technological advancement is second to none. Upon reaching this level, we tend to even have to organize our society for peace and ensure peace; They’re created conjointly to foster war technology.

In civilization’s domain, this model of development isn’t applaudable, neither is it virtuously excusable. Since it’s not ethically excusable, it’s socially devil-may-care. AN review of the premises can reveal that it’s the last one that poses a haul. The ultimate assumption is that the two initial premises’ conclusion isn’t in any approach logically deduced. What it shows may be a turbulently deduced conclusion, and being thus, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from a rationally ready mind, a minimum of at the time at that it was deduced.

A society that advances in keeping with the higher than presuppositions – and particularly in keeping with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its folks. Whether or not in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to figure precisely due to the prevalence syndrome that grips the leader and, therefore, the light-emitting diode. And a unique society that refuses to share within the collective sensibilities or passion of such organization has become attainable} or actual enemy and faces confrontation on all possible fronts by the expected logic.

Most of what we tend to find out about this world, of course, is dominated by progressive technology via the media. Societies that have the foremost of such technology also are time and once more, claimed to be the foremost advanced. It’s not solely their advancement that lifts them to the head of power, superiority, and fame. They’ll conjointly use technology to alter and perceive life and nature in a very completely different direction. This direction tends to eliminate the maximum amount as doable, a previous affiliation between life and nature that was mystical and unsafe in several respects. This last purpose doesn’t essentially mean that technological advancement may be a mark of a superior civilization.

What we’d like to understand is that civilization and technology aren’t marital status terms. Civilized folks might have advanced technology, or they will not have it. Culture isn’t merely a matter of science and technology or technical infrastructure, or, again, the marvel of buildings; it conjointly must do with people’s ethical and mental reflexes and their level of social connectedness at intervals their society and on the far side. From the overall behavior makeup of individuals, all sorts of physical structures can be created, thus questioning science and technology. Therefore, the type of bridges, roads, buildings, serious machinery, among others, that we will see in society might tell, in a very general approach, the activity pattern of the folks. Activity patterns might conjointly mean plenty regarding the extent to that the natural atmosphere has been used for infrastructural activities, science, and technology. Above all, the activity pattern might tell plenty regarding the folks’ perceptions and understanding regarding people.